pelo direito a vida

[nunopires]

Penso que isto merece a mais ampla divulgação, pf vejam o video

http://www.peta2.com/takecharge/swf/fur_farm.swf

e espreitem este site ele merece todo o nosso apoio


http://www.peta2.com

[bombo]

Este site mete-me nervos com os seus conteuds........
K horror....O k fazem com os bichinhos!!
Deviam morrer!!

Bruno

[Arcanjo]

bombo...rico exemplo de humanidade deu voce agora...não morremos da doenºa morremos da cura....e voces continuam a papar isto...informem-se antes de virem com PETAs....estamos a falar de um grupo terrorista que apoia a extinção do animal de companhia...deixem de ser otarios e informem-se.


Arcanjo

[bombo]

Não percebi... Pode se explicar melhor? atacou-me sem eu perceber porquê...??

Bruno

[Arcanjo]

bombo...não é bem para si...apesar de achar que o deviam morrer..é um bocado forte...refiro-me sim às pessoas não se informarem melhor do que é realmente a PETA...pois depois de informado...você provavelmente diria..."eles Peta...deviam morrer todos"...e mesmo assim seria forte para mim que so pacifista...o quanto baste!

[Arcanjo]

so para teres uma ideia....

PETA wants you to believe their intentions are the same as the original hunters and fishermen who started the wildlife and animal conservation movement, but their actions prove their intentions are far different. PETA is and always has been quick to protest anything that will get them in the media, but never provide a realistic solution to the issue.

Complete liberation of animals. - PETA claims complete liberation is the main goal, but they fail to address the ramifications of this radical idea.

They want animals to have more rights than human beings.
They are against eating meat.
They are against people having pets.
They are against hunting and fishing.
They are against the use of seeing-eye dogs.
They are against the use of dolphins by the US military to find ocean mines.
They are against the use of police dogs.
They are against the use of animals for research that saves human lives.
They are against putting animals in a zoo.
They are against using animals for any form of entertainment.
They are hypocrites.
Exploiting human suffering to further their own agenda.

They claim the 6 Million Jews slaughtered during the Holocaust does not compare to Billions of chickens that will be killed for human consumption.
When celebrity meat eaters become terminally ill, they launch campaigns to blame the disease on eating meat even when no medical research supports their claim.
When tragic events occur in the news, they launch campaigns that call the event insignificant to the killing of animals for food. A prime example would be the killing spree in Vancouver in which 15 women were killed. PETA tried to purchase full-page ads in the local papers, saying it doesn't compare to the killing of animals for food. The papers would not allow the advertisement. Originally, the authorities believed the women were killed by Robert Pickton, a pig farmer who may have given meat products to friends that contained human remains. PETA launched an outdoor ad, which featured a picture of a young woman along side of a pig, with the caption "Neither of us is meat."
PETA put up billboards of New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani with a milk mustache over the caption, "Got prostate cancer?" when he announced that he had prostate cancer and ended his campaign for the U.S. Senate.
Put animals before humans.

After September 11th, PETA issued a press release accusing Mayor Giuliani of "poor record when it comes to animals" claiming that he should be setting up a task force to retrieve nearby cats and dogs that have been "high traumatized and left orphaned" Keep in mind that all human resources were focused on rescuing humans from the debris, what rescue personnel who weren't killed in the collapse of the towers, were working days with little or no sleep; rescue personnel from around the country flew to NYC to help.
Claim that if research on just one animal could save 50 Million human lives, they would be against it.
-"Even if animal tests produced a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it."
- PETA President Ingrid Newkirk, September 1989, Vogue Magazine

Spends more on promoting themselves than on animals.

In a 1992 report by the NCIB, National Charities Investigation Bureau, PETA spent 42% of its organizational expenses on fundraising. Only 20% on actual research and investigation in to animal cruelty.
More current reports examining PETA's tax filings have shown as little as 1% of PETA's total revenue actually goes directly to helping animals; usually small donations to animal clinics or similar organizations. PETA's 2001 tax filings show some interesting donations:
Compassion Unlimited Plus Action - Bangalore - Donation - $11.11
PETA Research & Education Foundations - Donations $29.16
In Defense of Animals - Donation $71.11
Virginia Police Defense Fund, Norfolk Police Union - Donation - $150
Society for Abolition of Animal Exploitation - Donation - $150
Kalamazoo Animal Liberation League - Donation - $150
Vieques Humane Society - Donation - $25
SNAP - Donation - $50,000
PETA's donations totaled only $206,655.58, but they had a total revenue of almost $14 Million.

PETA spent the following on

PETA TV - Expense - $13,268.84
Electronic equipment, computers, cameras - Expense- $33,869.24
Automobiles - Expense - $148,362.02
SNAP Vehicle - Expense - $150,000.00
Buildings and improvements - Expense - $295,101.60 (After a $195,000 donation of property)
Land - Expense - 94,170.00
It makes one ask the questions, what is PETA really about? Why do they choose to spend more money on promoting themselves than actually helping animals?

Supporting Terrorism.

PETA has contributed thousands of dollars to known activist extremists. Most of these extremist were involved in either ALF or ELF, two organizations under FBI watch. The FBI is monitoring these organizations for acts of terrorism in the United States. These acts include arson, bombings, cutting the brake lines on fishery trucks, breaking and entering, destruction of government and organizational research laboratories and murder. ALF, in one statement, has admitted to over 100 acts of terrorism, all in the name of animal rights and the economy.
PETA has given over $45,000 to the defense of Rodney Coronado, an ALF member convicted of a firebombing at Michigan State University. During this criminal act of arson, Rodney Coronado stole documents and had them sent to a PETA member, the sending of these packages was prearranged by the president of PETA, herself. One of the packages was intercepted by the FBI.
Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, during his last meal, decided to not eat meat. PETA’s response to this was given by Bruce Friedrich, when he told reporters “Mr. McVeigh’s decision to go vegetarian groups him with some of the world’s greatest visionaries."
PETA published a pamphlet entitled "Activism and the law", that offers advice on burning laboratory buildings. This same pamphlet states "there is a higher law than that written by those who subjugate the helpless", it states that the use of illegal actions may be unpopular, but "no struggle against exploitation has been won without them."
PETA contributed $27,000 to the legal defense of Roger Troen for burglary and arson at the University of Oregon in 1986. In 1989, PETA informed its members of the payment.
PETA's 1988 Form 990. PETA contributed $7,500 to the legal defense of Fran Stephanie Trutt, convicted of possessing pipe bombs and prosecuted for the attempted murder of the president of a medical laboratory.
PETA's 2001 Form 990. PETA payed lawyer fees for animal rights criminals involving the North American Earth Liberation Front, an FBI-declared domestic terrorist organization.
-"I will be the last person to condemn ALF (Animal Liberation Front)."
- Ingrid Newkirk, in the New York Daily News, [December 7, 1997]

-"McVeigh's decision to go vegetarian groups him with some of the world's greatest visionaries."
- Bruce Friedrich praising Oklahoma City bomber and mass-murderer Timothy McVeigh, for choosing a vegetarian last meal

-"If we really believe that animals have the same right to be free from pain and suffering at our hands, then, of course we’re going to be, as a movement, blowing things up and smashing windows … I think it’s a great way to bring about animal liberation … I think it would be great if all of the fast-food outlets, slaughterhouses, these laboratories, and the banks that fund them exploded tomorrow. I think it's perfectly appropriate for people to take bricks and toss them through the windows ... Hallelujah to the people who are willing to do it."
- Bruce Friedrich, vegan campaign coordinator of PETA, “Animal Rights 2001” conference

Guilty of being hypocrites.

PETA claims animal research is useless to the medical field, but their Vice President, Mary Beth Sweetland, has no problem injecting insulin to help control her diabetes. She claims that she is not a hypocrite, but she needs her life to continue fighting for animals.
In 1999, PETA euthanized 1,325 of the 2,103 animals it took. PETA claimed that euthanizing the cats was much kinder than leaving them in the streets. PETA made the statement that a quick painless death is much better than a slow painful one. However, when hunters or farmers talk of quick painless ways of killing animals, PETA calls them barbarians and claim no animal death is justified.
Brainwashing children.

They have committed to the use of propaganda in elementary schools, claiming they can influence the foundation of children's beliefs to make it easier to persuade them as teenagers and adults. They use scare tactics, and unethical methods of convincing children milk and meat is bad.
-"Our campaigns are always geared towards children and they always will be"
-Dan Matthews, Vice President of PETA on the Fox News Network [December 19, 2003]

[AbsoltuBruno]

Este video causou-me mau estar, nem consegui ver até ao fim...não há limites......uma pessoa capaz de fazer o que o video mostra só pode ser doente ou desequilibrada!!!!....isto é terror!!!

[fionapoly]

ola arcanjo li com mta atençaõ o artigo sobre a peta,se assim o e' realmente estava enganada com essa organizaçao ,de qualquer das formas e quer queiramos quer nao o video que nos foi deixado pelo nuno pires,para quem gosta de animais naõ pode ser visto de animo leve se quer um desabafo eu ate chorei, contudo,e volto a frisar agradeço o artigo da peta que desconhecia

[casadiscaes]

Peça à peta (mais conhecida como mentirita) as imagens por editar... é que nunca ninguém as viu nem se sabe o que é verdade ou montagem nesse filme...

[Pedro21]

A PETA tem as seus lados bons e o chamar a atenção para situações graves é um deles, mas como um todo a organização é demasiado perigosa, e é perigosa pela simples razão que é fundamentalista, o objectivo final de alguns dos seus membros é claramente impedir a manutenção dos animais em cativeiro em qualquer forma, incluído para estimação (critério dúbio), para os donos dos animais de estimação apoiar este tipo de organizações ou para ecologistas o fazerem é um pouco como um judeu apoiar o partido nazista só porque concorda com as suas politicas económicas, o fundamental da questão é que todos nos que fazemos parte deste fórum acreditamos que podemos viver em simbiose com espécies animais e eles não acreditam nisso, é tão simples como isto, isto não impede que concordemos com eles em alguns pontos mas não os devemos apoiar em nenhum caso, a PETA nos USA tem muita força, esteve quase a conseguir passar uma lei na Califórnia que ia em termos práticos impedir a manutenção de espécies em cativeiro para fins lúdicos a famosa CA AB 2862, foi por muito pouco que foi travada mas eles vão tentar outra vez.


Pedro Ramalho

[Suricata]

POR FAVOR!!!

Informe que o tópico é demasiado chocante!!!!!

[VascoV]

Foi aqui colocado só para desestabilizar... É como o dos maus tratos da eukanuba aos cães...mais uam pérola...

[Mkiko]

Isto é tudo PETA

[alexandra_m]

POR FAVOR!!!

Informe que o tópico é demasiado chocante!!!!!

É isso mesmo suricata.
Fiquei mesmo mal... Não sabia que eram tão fortes as imagens.
Acho que nem devia ter colocado aqui o vídeo. Não havia necessidade.

[Mkiko]